Quantcast
Channel: Refreshing News
Viewing all 6389 articles
Browse latest View live

US Senate Unanimously Votes To End Unfair Subsidies For ‘Too Big To Fail’ Banks

$
0
0

“Too big to fail.”
This phrase will always be associated with the 2008 economic collapse that sent America into the deepest recession since 1929. In order to stop the financial bleeding, the U.S. government voted to rescue the big banks rather than allow them to fail and take our economy with them. Ever since, big banks have only gotten bigger on the premise that if they fail again, the government will bail them out. Billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies have been dealt to those very banks in the years since.
But on Friday, the U.S. Senate did something that it rarely does these days. An amendment was offered as an attachment to the Senate budget bill and it not only gained the support of both Republicans and Democrats, it received unanimous support. By a vote of 99-0, the U.S. Senate voted to strip “too big to fail” banks of the taxpayer subsidies they’ve been getting for far too long.

According to The Hill, the amendment was introduced by Louisiana Republican David Vitter and Ohio Democrat Sherrod Brown. The bipartisan proposal “ends Too Big To Fail subsidies or funding advantages for Wall Street mega-banks with more than $500 billion in assets.”
Senator Vitter said:
“There are at least three independent studies recently that underscore that ‘Too Big To Fail’ is still alive and well,” and that, “’Too Big To Fail’ policies are creating an unfair playing field for smaller banks.”
Additionally, The Hill reported:
“Brown and Vitter argue that the Dodd-Frank financial reform law didn’t do enough to keep large banks in check. They say that if banks are still ‘Too Big To Fail,’ they have an unfair advantage and are able to borrow more money since lenders believe they would be bailed out if a risky investment fails.”
The unanimous vote marks the first time the U.S. Senate has made a move against “too big to fail” since passage of the Dodd-Frank law. The amendment should be seen as a victory for Occupy Wall Street, which protested the big banks and “too big to fail” for over a year. It’s also a win for Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, who has been crusading against the big banks on behalf of taxpayers since long before being elected to office last year.
The amendment to end big bank subsidies is certainly justified. Two reports indicate that the banks were rolling in taxpayer dollars that they didn’t need. In February, Bloomberg News reported that the big banks made an estimated $83 billion a year. But that number could be even higher, according to top banking analyst, Chris Whalen. In March, Whalen estimated that big banks rake in more than $780 billion of government subsidies every year. That means banks have been making trillions of dollars over the last few years even though they didn’t need the money.
After hearing those numbers, it’s clear the U.S. Senate made a wise decision to eliminate subsidies for big banks. This will undoubtedly save hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars to be used for different causes like infrastructure and jobs.

The only problem, of course, is now that the Senate has passed their version of the budget, complete with an end to government handouts to Wall Street banks, it falls to the House to approve the bill and send it to the President. In short, we have to depend on House Republicans to get the job done and, considering the conservative obsession with forcing the Ryan Budget upon America, passage of the Senate bill looks grim. The Senate finally gets their act together and unites to do something right for a change, and now conservative extremists in the House could ruin it for everyone. Now would the time for everyone to get on the phone with their representative in Congress to demand passage of the Senate budget.

The Senate deserves credit and huge cheers for uniting against the big banks that have been trying to take American taxpayers for every penny they’ve made over many years. Now if the Senate could just strip defense contractors and Big Oil of their taxpayer subsidies as well, we can pay off our debt, stop targeting programs that help Americans, and get back to the surplus days of the Clinton Administration.

Judge refused to throw out a civil rights lawsuit of an unarmed, mentally-ill Ohio man who died after being shocked with a stun gun 7 times, kicked and repeatedly struck with a baton

$
0
0
A federal judge today refused to throw out a civil rights lawsuit in the case of an unarmed, mentally ill Ohio man who died during a confrontation with police after being shocked with a stun gun seven times, kicked and repeatedly struck with a baton - all mostly after he had fallen face-first onto cement and stopped moving. 

Doug Boucher, 39, died after the Dec. 13, 2009, confrontation with two officers outside a convenience store in the Cincinnati suburb of Mason. Boucher had been stopped for allegedly making lewd comments to the store's 19-year-old female clerk. 

Attorneys for the city of Mason had argued that the officers' actions were reasonable and justified, and that the lawsuit, filed by Boucher's parents, should be dropped. 

In his ruling, U.S. District Judge S. Arthur Spiegel allowed allegations of excessive force, wrongful death and intentional infliction of emotional distress to stand. 

He also denied the city's request to stop a forensic pathologist from testifying that he believes the repeated use of the stun gun caused Boucher's heart to fail. 

"What gives the court pause is that (the officers) repeatedly tased Boucher in such manner that a jury might find he was subjected to gratuitous violence from officers that momentarily `lost it.'" Spiegel wrote. 

He set a trial date for June 18. 

Gary Becker, the Cincinnati attorney representing Mason and both officers, said he was "obviously very disappointed" in today's ruling and that he and his clients will need to decide whether to appeal it or go to trial in hopes of winning. 

Shortly after Boucher's death, Mason police said only that he had died after being shocked by a stun gun. Documents obtained by The Associated Press in December revealed how many times the device had been used and that Boucher was lying immobile and face-down on the ground for five of them. 

Officers Daniel Fry and Sean McCormick said in depositions that Boucher left the convenience store at their request after the clerk complained about him. When McCormick approached Boucher from behind and put a hand on his shoulder, they said that Boucher clenched his fists and began screaming. 

Fry said he got one handcuff on Boucher's wrist before he spun around and punched the officer in the head twice. A wrestling match ensued before McCormick yelled for Fry to move and shocked Boucher in the chest with his stun gun, causing him to fall to his knees. 

The officers said Boucher then spotted the clerk outside, got up and ran toward her. 

That's when Fry shocked Boucher in the back, causing him to fall hard, face-first into the pavement, landing with his hands underneath him and out of the officers' view, according to the depositions. 

Although Boucher wasn't moving, McCormick testified he kicked him and hit him with his baton, and ordered Fry to stun him twice more. Although Fry testified he only remembered stunning Boucher three times, information downloaded from the device showed he used it six times in a 75-second span. 

A third officer, Bradley Walker, testified that when he arrived at the scene, he saw McCormick hit a motionless Boucher with the baton about five times and saw Fry use his stun gun on him. 

The officers handcuffed Boucher, patted him down and turned him over, only to find that he wasn't breathing and his face was covered in blood. Boucher was dead minutes later despite attempts to revive him. 

Butler County Deputy Coroner James Swinehart found that Boucher did not have alcohol or drugs in his system and died from the fall, although he said he couldn't rule out that the stun gun use as a factor. 

Dr. Cyril Wecht, a forensic pathologist representing Boucher's family, believes the stuns were what caused Boucher's death, and Spiegel's ruling means that he can tell that to a jury. 

Neither officer was disciplined and the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation cleared both of wrongdoing. 

Fry and McCormick have defended their actions, saying their use of force was appropriate, given that they couldn't see Boucher's hands, that he had punched one of them and was running toward the clerk. 

Jennifer Branch, the Boucher family attorney, has said that the officers should have allowed Boucher to get in his car and leave because making a lewd comment is not a criminal offense, and that their escalating use of force was inappropriate. 

Boucher's parents, who live in Marion, Ind. - where Boucher lived until he was about 30 - are seeking unspecified damages. His family said he was bipolar and not in treatment. 

Boucher, who was divorced, also is survived by a daughter.

One in five French bottled waters 'contain drugs or pesticides'

$
0
0
Researchers analysed 47 widely available brands, and discovered 10 were contaminated with miniscule amounts


They are sold as being cleaner, healthier and purer than the water that spouts from the average French tap.
Now, however, an investigation has discovered traces of pesticides and prescription drugs – including a medicine used to treat breast cancer – in almost one in five brands of bottled water on the shelves of France's supermarkets.
While scientists say the contamination is minuscule and the water remains safe, consumer groups are warning of a "potential cocktail effect" for drinkers, and say the findings raise serious environmental concerns.
The study was carried out by the consumer magazine 60 Millions de Consommateurs and the non-governmental organisation specialising in global water issues, Fondation France Libertés.
Researchers analysed 47 brands of bottled water widely available in France, and discovered that 10 contained "residues from drugs or pesticides".
"The biggest surprise was the presence of tamoxifen, a synthetic hormone used in the treatment of breast cancer," the magazine said. It reported finding traces of the powerful prescription drug in the popular brands Mont Roucous, St-Yorre, Salvetat, Saint Amand and the Carrefour discount label Céline Cristaline.
It added the quantity was minute but "enough for us to question the purity of the original produce imposed by regulations covering mineral water".
Traces of the prescription drugs buflomedil and naftidrofuryl, known as vasodilators and used to dilate arteries in those with high blood pressure, were found in Hepar and Saint Amand mineral waters.
Molecules from pesticides banned in 2001 were found in bottles of Vittel, Volvic, Cora and Cristaline.
After the mineral water companies contested the results, the magazine commissioned a second round of tests, which confirmed the first results.
"It's true the micropollutants found were present in very small quantities, but the range of them raises concerns about a potential cocktail effect," 60 Millions de Consommateurs reported.
"This is serious enough to call for a much bigger study," it added, calling for tighter controls on bottled waters to identify "new pollutants".
Thomas Laurenceau, the magazine's editor, said: "What we found is not that one brand is more risky than another; there are no good and bad. The problem is across the whole range.
"The bottlers are extremely careful but it is worrying to see things there that shouldn't be there, even if they are in minuscule quantities."
He added: "In the short term, there is absolutely no problem of quality and these waters are perfectly drinkable. We are talking about tiny traces, millionths of a micron, it's really minuscule".
He said the inquiry did not question the honesty of those bottling the water but said there was "concern about the overall resource" in the light of environmental contamination by humans.
In 2011, the magazine and France Libertés launched Opération Transparence, calling for greater testing of water supplies and in January published a map of tap water quality in France showing pollution limits were passed in 420 areas.
In the latest report, Perrier water and Quézac were declared "clean" by the magazine.

America’s top copyright cop wants to make it a felony to stream songs without permission

$
0
0

U.S. Register of Copyrights Maria Pallante urged Congress on Wednesday to overhaul the nation's aging copyright system.

One of her top priorities, she said, would be to make it a felony to stream copyrighted songs or videos without permission. It is currently a felony to distribute illegal copies of copyrighted works for download, but websites that offer unauthorized streams are only guilty of a misdemeanor.

"There is a gap in the law," Pallante said during a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee's subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet. "If there is illegal streaming happening, especially in an egregious, willful, profit-driven kind of way, how do you get at that activity if the best that you can do is go after them for a misdemeanor?"
She explained that streaming is rapidly becoming a more popular way for consuming online content, including illegal content, than downloading.

"Whether you're streaming the Super Bowl, whether you're streaming music, a movie, the point is that you don't always need to have a copy, and the consumer may not want a copy," she said.
Pallante argued that copyright laws have failed to keep pace with technology and the system is badly in need of a comprehensive overhaul, but she acknowledged that such sweeping legislation could take years to craft.

"What you suggest will take some time, and there is no guarantee this subcommittee will agree to undertake it," said Rep. Howard Coble (R-N.C.), the chairman of the subcommittee. But lawmakers expressed interest in Pallante's suggestions and hope that Congress could enact some kind of reform.

Pallante argued that the goal of copyright is to promote the public interest, and that the public's interest usually aligns with the interest of authors and other content producers. She argued that a strong copyright system is critical for rewarding innovation and creativity. 
Pallante said better enforcement would have to be part of broad reform but that the government should focus on going after major Internet pirates profiting from the works of others and not a "teenager downloading music."

She also argued that copyright law is confusing and that people are often unsure about how to use works without violating the law. She urged Congress to pass a more accessible copyright act that can help guide artists, consumers and the courts.

Currently, copyrighted works are protected for the life of the authors plus 70 years. Pallante proposed changing the rule to life-plus-50 years unless heirs register with the Copyright Office.
No one at Wednesday's hearing mentioned the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), the controversial copyright enforcement bill that Congress pulled last year after a massive online protest. Pallante expressed dismay at the "tone" of the debate over copyright protection, and said that foreign websites offering pirated content are still a problem.  

10 Health Benefits of Mangos

$
0
0
Mangos taste so good that people forget they are also healthy!  Discover how the “king of fruits” can help you, plus fascinating trivia and a few mango cautions and concerns.

Health Benefits:
1.  Prevents Cancer:
Research has shown antioxidant compounds in mango fruit have been found to protect against colon, breast, leukemia and prostate cancers. These compounds include quercetin, isoquercitrin, astragalin, fisetin, gallic acid and methylgallat, as well as the abundant enzymes.

2.  Lowers Cholesterol:
The high levels of fiber, pectin and vitamin C help to lower serum cholesterol levels, specifically Low-Density Lipoprotein (the bad stuff)

3.  Clears the Skin:
Can be used both internally and externally for the skin. Mangos clear clogged pores and eliminate pimples.

4.  Eye Health:
One cup of sliced mangoes supplies 25 percent of the needed daily value of vitamin A, which promotes good eyesight and prevents night blindness and dry eyes.

5.  Alkalizes the Whole Body:
The tartaric acid, malic acid, and a trace of citric acid found in the fruit help to maintain the alkali reserve of the body.

6. Helps in Diabetes:
Mango leaves help normalize insulin levels in the blood.  The traditional home remedy involves boiling leaves in water, soaking through the night and then consuming the filtered decoction in the morning. Mango fruit also have a relatively low glycemic index (41-60) so moderate quantities will not spike your sugar levels.
 7. Improved Sex:
Mangos are a great source of vitamin E. Even though the popular connection between sex drive and vitamin E was originally created by a mistaken generalization on rat studies, further research has shown balanced proper amounts (as from whole food) does help in this area.



8. Improves Digestion:
Papayas are not the only fruit that contain enzymes for breaking down protein. There are several fruits, including mangoes, which have this healthful quality. The fiber in mangos also helps digestion and elimination.


9. Remedy for Heat Stroke
Juicing the fruit from green mango and mixing with water and a sweetener helps to cool down the body and prevent harm to the body. From an ayurvedic viewpoint, the reason people often get diuretic and exhausted when visiting equatorial climates is because the strong “sun energy” is burning up your body, particularly the muscles.  The kidneys then become overloaded with the toxins from this process.


10. Boosts Immune system
The generous amounts of vitamin C and vitamin A in mangos, plus 25 different kinds of carotenoids keep your immune system healthy and strong.


Surprising Things That Can Age You Faster!

$
0
0
Signs of ageing are an inevitable part of your life, but how soon you look old depends on what kind of lifestyle you follow. Looking at your reflection in the mirror, you perhaps wish to rewind to the time when you were young and beautiful. Even after using expensive anti-ageing products and eating healthy, there might be a few elements in your lifestyle that could ruin all your hard work. Here we reveal some shocking factors that are silently making you older every minute.
 

Drinking From Straws: Do you enjoy sipping your cold coffee or juice slowly through a straw? It sure is easy, convenient and fun but drinking from straw also could add those fine lines and wrinkles around your mouth as smoking does. Try avoiding those tempting and colorful straws to keep wrinkles at bay.

Exercise - Too Little or Too Much: This might sound amusing as we are living in an era where we are being fed with information that credits exercise for beautiful hair, beautiful skin and beautiful body. But too much or too little could do exactly the opposite to you. Too little exercise can increase the risks of obesity, heart problems and shorten your life span whereas too much exercise can increase the risks of arthritis and joint pains. You need to stop being lazy and avoid over-exercise as well, to stay energetic and fresh all day long. "Adequate Exercise" is what you need to keep in mind to stay young.

Sugar: Sugar is sweet, but can leave a bitter impression on your skin and overall health. Eating too much sugar is clearly bad for your waistline, and is linked with appearance of wrinkles and other ageing spots on your skin. Hike in sugar levels in your body causes glycation, a natural biochemical process that harms the collagen in your skin. Once the collagen is damaged, it normally hardens and causes wrinkles and sagging.

Soap: Soap, you might think is your skin's best friend when it comes to killing those dirty and bad germs but actually when it comes to your skin, it is not. Your skin has an acid layer that is a protective barrier for the skin. Soap is generally alkaline and when you wash your skin with soap, this protective shield is getting removed and dries out the skin, eventually causing wrinkles. It is advisable to change to pH neutral and chemical free cleanser and keep in mind that there is something called over - cleansing your skin that is equally bad for you.

Stressful Job: Now, you can blame your boss for those dark spots and dark circles on your face.Job is very important in life but what if your job is a major factor that is making you look older? Your job could be the biggest reason for your premature ageing. Work is one of the biggest sources of stress to many people. Recent studies reveal that stressful work can increase the risk of heart disease and speed up cell ageing. Too much time at work could cause too little time to spend on self such as proper exercise, adequate sleep and proper meals to name some. Try avoiding stress at workplace to help minimizing damages due to stress and try to enjoy and relax during weekends.

Air Conditioners: Air conditioning such as heating and cooling the room are a root cause to accelerate the process of ageing and can severely cause skin drying and lead to premature ageing and wrinkles. To help your skin look youthful and fresh, turn down the heating and start wearing more layers of woolens to keep yourself warm. Keep a glass of water in the room to increase the amount of humidity in the environment and apply the right cream on your skin to keep it moisturized.

Listening to Loud Music: Hearing loss is what happens when you are as old as your grandparents but listening to loud music and not taking proper care of your ears could lead to hearing loss at a very young age. Listening to loud music on your headphones for an hour could temporarily affect your hearing abilities while some studies say that listening to music in full volume could put you at risk of permanent hearing loss. Now you wouldn't want that, right?

Your Dirty Pillow Case: Do you believe in beauty sleep? Did you know that your beauty sleep could actually turn you old instead? Pillow covers extract all dirt and oils from your face and cause acne and pimples on your face. It is necessary to change the pillow covers every week. Plus, if your cotton pillow covers have imprints and embroidery, they are also believed to cause fine lines and wrinkles when your face is pressed on it while sleeping. It is advised to use pillow covers without any embroidery or to switch to satin pillowcases that create less fine lines than the cotton ones. Make sure that you sleep clean before you hit the sack.

Diets Low in Fats: We believe that cutting out fats helps us stay in shape, but cutting out healthy and good fats can harm your health instead. These good fats include omega-3 fatty acids present in fish, olives and nuts that are essential for your young and healthy look. They help to keep signs of ageing and wrinkles at bay, keep your heart in good condition, and can even help to increase your lifespan.

Watching TV: We are keeping the most shocking, jaw-dropping ageing factor in the end to hold your attention. You ever thought your inspiring chat-shows or the heart-touching movies could spell bad news for your health as they increase your waistline? Take yourself back to those long TV shows that made you drool on nachos, and potato chips, those long sleepless nights of watching movies back to back and not to mention the harm you are doing to your eyes due to the bright and harmful rays from your TV set. A recent research shows that each hour of watching TV could reduce 22 minutes of your life, and increase the risks of Alzheimer's disease.

7 Interesting Facts About Soups

$
0
0
There’s nothing that pleases our taste buds better than a bowl of soup on a chilly evening. It’s warms you up and satisfies those evening hunger pangs too. But how much do you really know about your favourite evening snack?

Here are some interesting health facts and trivia you didn’t know about soups!
1. The word soup is of Sanskrit origin! It is derived from the su and po, which means good nutrition.

2. Soups are great as fillers when you are on a diet. Don’t want to stuff yourself at dinner? Have a soup just before. A cup of soup also makes for a smart low-cal snack. Simply opt for a clear soup like Knorr’s Hot and Sour or Veg Manchow Soup to make sure you keep the calories away.

3. Want to remove excess fat from your soup? Simply take a lettuce leaf and draw it across the surface of the soup. The excess fat sticks to the leaf. You can also skim the excess fat off with a large spoon.

4. Do your kids cringe at the sight of vegetables? The perfect solution to that would be soups! Soups are the perfect way to incorporate vegetables in your diet. Not only are they nutritious but they are very tasty too. So now you can sneak in vegetables like tomatoes, spinach and cabbage in your child’s diet and have him enjoy it! Try Knorr’s Classic Thick Tomato Soup which is tasty and nutritious!

5. We ‘eat’ and don’t drink soup. In most cultures, soup is had as a part of the meal. According to etiquette experts, since we consume soup with a spoon as opposed to sipping it from a bowl, we ‘eat’ it.

6. Creamy soups are simply yummy. But, you would want to stay away from them if you want to lose weight. Get this: One cup of light whipping cream contains approximately 700 calories and 74 grams of fat! You could always drink a cup of Knorr soup though. As these soups are low on trans-fats, sodium, saturated fats and sugar.

7. Soups are energisers! Do you invariably get late for dinner? Simply have a bowl of soup. The high water content in soups will keep you full and give you nutrition too. A bowl of hot, delicious soup would make a great dinner. And no, you wouldn’t even see the need to wake up later for a midnight snack!  Knorr soups are nutritious as they are made of dehydrated veggies that are freeze-dried to make sure the nutrients are preserved.

8 alarmingly unhealthy snacks to avoid

$
0
0
In a perfect world, everyone (kids included) would snack on carrots and kale chips. For those who do, hats off. But for everyone else, once you step away from the produce aisle, the choice of snacks can run the gamut from nutritionally vapid to downright deleterious. And sadly, consumers are often at the mercy of the processed food industry with its seductive yet unhealthy ingredients and powerful marketing machines. It’s all too easy to be swayed by items marketed specifically to children and parents — with enticing prices, misleading labels and the promise of convenience.
 
But when consumers start to dig a bit, they'll get a better picture of what’s going on inside the snacks they devour. Following is a snapshot of some of the worst offenders. The list is by no means exhaustive, but these examples provide some clues about what to look out for in the snack aisle.
 
1. Pop-Secret Homestyle Popcorn
Popcorn should be a great snack. It is a whole grain, naturally low in calories, and recent research has found that popped kernels are surprisingly high in antioxidants, even higher than many fruits and vegetables. So where did this super-snack go super-wrong? In the hands of food manufacturers, that’s where. How does this version compare to an order of McDonald’s Kids Fries? A serving of Pop-Secret has 70 more calories, 7 grams more total fat, 2 grams more saturated fat, 4.5 grams more trans fat, and 310 milligrams more sodium than the fried spuds.
 
Serving size: 2 tablespoons unpopped
Calories: 170
Total fat: 12 grams
Saturated fat: 2.5 grams
Trans fat: 4.5 grams
Sodium: 380 milligrams
 
2. Cheetos Puffs
Nobody ever said that oddly textured cheese snacks were exactly healthy, but something about the non-greasiness and airy quality of Cheetos Puffs (vibrant hue aside) seems like this product might more benign than, let’s say, super salty fried potato chips. But … look at that total fat! That sodium! That’s half the daily fat and sodium limit for many children, right there in 2 ounces of snack.
 
Serving size: 2 ounces (56 grams)
Calories: 320
Total fat: 20 grams
Saturated fat: 4 grams
Sodium: 700 milligrams
 
3. Yoplait Original 99% Fat Free (various fruit flavors)
Yogurt is another should-be healthy snack that has been hijacked by the food industry. Many yogurts are made to be low- or non-fat but are loaded with added sugar and other ingredients that are completely superfluous.
 
Whereas a product like Fage 0% is made of only “Grade A Pasteurized Skimmed Milk, and Live Active Yogurt Cultures,” Yoplait Original includes sugar, modified corn starch, high fructose corn syrup, kosher gelatin, and tricalcium phosphate — yet no live and active cultures, which is one of the main reasons to be eating yogurt in the first place!
 
Serving Size: 1 container (170 grams)
Calories: 170
Total fat: 1.5 grams
Saturated fat: 1 gram
Sodium: 85 milligrams
Sugars: 26 grams
 
4. Ritz Bits Cracker Sandwiches
Cheese and crackers sounds innocuous enough, but a single serving of these guys has more sodium and more than twice the saturated fat, as a small order of Chicken McNuggets — and more sugar than two Hershey’s Kisses.
 
Serving size: 1 single serve package (42 grams)
Calories: 220
Total fat: 13 grams
Saturated fat 4.5 grams
Sodium: 480 milligrams
Sugars: 6 grams
 
5. Auntie Anne's Pepperoni Pretzel Pocket 
Whole-wheat low-sodium pretzels are a good snack. Pepperoni Pretzel Pockets are a disaster. With more sodium, saturated fat and calories than a Big Mac, this one snack comes close to serving up the daily sodium and total fat limits for a child, not to mention the equivalent of nearly 3 teaspoons of granulated sugar.
 
Serving size: 1 pocket
Calories: 650
Total fat: 27 grams
Saturated fat 12 grams
Sodium: 1,120 milligrams
Sugars: 11 grams
 
6. Mott's Original Apple Sauce
This applesauce might just as well be called "high fructose corn syrup sauce," given that HFCS is the second ingredient after apples. Why do that to perfectly good apples? Apples aren't sweet enough?
 
Serving size: 1/2 cup (128g)
Calories: 110
Total fat: 0
Sugars: 25 grams
 
Instead, opt for the Mott's Natural Apple Sauce (No Sugar Added) version, which has only 50 calories and 12 grams of sugar.
 
7. Hostess Chocolate Pudding Pie
With the right spin, some could argue that a piece of pie isn’t the worst snack in the world. A small homemade slice filled with fruit and a light crust has some redeeming qualities. But the Hostess Chocolate Pudding Pie may, in fact, be the worst snack in the world! Why? In addition to its high fructose corn syrup, partially hydrogenated oils, beef fat and artificial colors, it has almost twice the sugar and fat of a similarly sized slice of homemade blueberry pie. And with its cheap price and easy portability, it’s all too easy to scarf down much of your daily calorie requirement in a few bites before you’ve even left the store.

Serving size: 1 pie (128g)
Calories: 520
Total fat: 24 grams
Saturated fat 12 grams
Sugars: 40 grams
 
8. Winchell’s Cranberry Nut Muffin 
What has the same amount of calories as four Winchell’s Chocolate Cake Doughnuts and nearly the same amount of fat as three hot dogs? One Winchell’s Cranberry Nut Muffin! To its credit, this muffin is not nutritionally void (5 grams of fiber and 14 grams of protein) but just beware: the calories, fat and sugar lodge this item more in the cupcake category than healthy snack family.
 
Serving size: 1 muffin
Calories: 670
Total fat: 37 grams
Saturated fat: 6 grams
Sodium: 640 milligrams
Sugars: 43 grams
 
How can you make better choices?
Look for snacks that are high in protein, vitamins, minerals, fiber, but relatively lower in calories, total fat, saturated fat (no trans fat), sugar and sodium.
 
Look at the ingredients on the label. Most of us know that ingredients are listed in order from most to least, and we may look to see where something like sugars or fats are listed in the order. But ingredient groups aren't required to be listed together. So something could contain corn syrup, cane sugar, and malt syrup in seemingly minor quantities toward the bottom of the list — but if you combine them together in a general group of "sugar," they quickly move to the top.
 
If a label boasts a product was made with whole grains, check to see where on the ingredient list the word "whole" is. If the first ingredient is "whole" wheat flour (or other grain), that's good. Sometimes whole grains make up only a tiny fragment of the item, and that's not good.
 
Also, it helps to know recommended nutritional limits. Many adults know what their numbers are, and here's what Mayo Clinic recommends for kids:
 
Boys and girls 4-8: 1,200-2,000 calories depending on activity, 25-35 percent calories from fat, 1,200 milligrams sodium.
Boys and girls 9-13: 1,400-2,600 calories depending on activity, 25-35 percent calories from fat, 1,300 milligrams sodium.
Boys and girls 14-18: 1,800-3,200 calories depending on activity, 25-35 percent calories from fat, 1,500 milligrams sodium.
 
Total fat for the categories above: 33 to 47 grams for 1,200 daily calories; 39 to 54 grams for 1,400 daily calories; 44 to 62 grams for 1,600 daily calories; 50 to 70 grams for 1,800 daily calories; 56 to 78 grams for 2,000 daily calories.

Calif. official to be paid $400K a year — for life

$
0
0
Working for the public good has also worked well for one California county administrator’s bank account.
According to reports by several newspapers, Alameda County, in the San Francisco Bay Area, is paying its County Administrator Susan Muranishi, north of $400,000—for life. This includes a generous base salary of $301,000, plus taxpayer-funded deferred pension plans paid for by the county.

The pension accounts are set by a formula that multiplies years of service by 2 to 3 percent of the top salary to calculate the benefit. With 38 years of service under her belt, the top Alameda official, along with two top county executives, benefit lavishly.
The publication notes, “Muranishi, for example, was the highest-paid county administrator in the Bay Area, with $422,268 in salary last year. In addition, she received $137,196 toward her pension and another $46,500 dumped into a pair of deferred compensation accounts.” Most pension plans require the employee to pay in—but not in this case.

Even without the extra pension plans, Muranishi’s base salary alone stands out. Her salary is more than the rate for similar positions in San Francisco ($153,000), Chicago ($128,000) and New York City ($152,000).

President Barack Obama’s base salary, by the way, is $400,000.

Pensions are determined by the board of supervisors, but officials sign up for the special accounts.
A column from the San Francisco Chronicle asserts that Muranishi’s salary includes “$24,000, plus change, in ‘equity pay’ to guarantee that she makes at least 10 percent more than anyone else in the county. About $54,000 a year in ‘longevity’ pay for having stayed with the county for more than 30 years; an annual performance bonus of $24,000; and another $9,000 a year for serving on the county’s three-member Surplus Property Authority, an ad hoc committee of the Board of Supervisors that oversees the sale of excess land.” She also gets a $8,292 yearly car allowance.

It's not bad, considering that Alameda County is facing budget deficits and residents have a per capita income of $34,937, according to the latest figures from the U.S. Census Bureau.
Kris Vosburgh, executive director of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, a government watchdog group, told the Mercury News the compensation plan is too much. "It borders on looting the public treasury. They don't look at what they do as public service. They look at it as an opportunity for self-enrichment. This really hits the outrage factor."

Outrage was evident on Twitter. One commenter, Du Crusoe ‏@DuCrusoe, posted, "Alameda Co CA Administrator Susan Muranishi retires with wage of $423,664 a year = $35,500mo.?!?! ~~ disabled US vet gets $2,769.mo." Another commenter, dr maxcua ‏@MaxCUA, wrote, "#alameda county rewards "administrator" THIEF →susan muranishi $400k…for life + $300k sal." And Ryan Winkler ‏@Ryan_Winkler posted, "Alameda Cnty Admin Susan Muranishi will receive a pension of $423,664 a year. In WI, that was a scandal."
The state recently weathered a scandal in the low-income town of Bell (pop. 37,000) in Southern California. Bell was exposed by the Los Angeles Times as paying its city manager close to $800,000 a year—twice the salary of the Los Angeles police chief and the New York City police commissioner.

Income Growth For Bottom 90 Percent Of Americans Averaged Just $59 Over 4 Decades: Analysis

$
0
0

Incomes for the bottom 90 percent of Americans only grew by $59 on average between 1966 and 2011 (when you adjust those incomes for inflation), according to an analysis by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist David Cay Johnston for Tax Analysts. During the same period, the average income for the top 10 percent of Americans rose by $116,071, Johnston found.
To put that into perspective: if you say the $59 boost is equivalent to one inch, then the incomes of the top 10 percent of Americans rose by 168 feet, Johnston explained to Alternet last week
Johnston’s long-distance analogy is one way to look at the huge gap between the rich and everyone else, and there are many ways to think about and compare income growth and inequality across various segments of the population. Incomes for the bottom fifth of Americans, for instance, grew about 20 percent between 1979 and 2007, according to a 2011 study from the Congressional Budget Office. During the same period, members of the top 1 percent saw their incomes grow by 275 percent.
Another way to illustrate the huge disparity: the six heirs to the Walmart fortune had a net worth equivalent to the bottom 41.5 percent of Americans combined in 2010, according to an analysis from Josh Bivens at the Economic Policy Institute.
While income inequality may be great for those reaping the big bucks at the top, it’s likely hurting Americans overall. Greater income equality is correlated with stronger economic growth, according to a 2011 IMF report.

Supreme Court Rules Dog Sniff at Front Door is a Search; Barred by the 4th Amendment

$
0
0

Prior to hearing oral argument in the Proposition 8 case this morning, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Florida v. Jardines, the other dog sniff case (Florida v. Harris was decided last month).  In an opinion written by Justice Scalia, the Court affirmed the Florida Supreme Court.  The Court held a dog sniff at the front door of a house where the police suspected drugs were being grown constitutes a search for purposes of the Fourth Amendment.  Justice Kagan filed a concurrence joined by Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor.  Justice Alito filed a dissent joined by the Chief Justice, and Justices Kennedy and Breyer.
Justice Scalia’s opinion for the Court resolved the Fourth Amendment question solely on property rights grounds, holding that bringing a dog to conduct a forensic search on someone’s porch constitutes a trespass at common law and, under the reasoning of last term’s GPS case, United States v. Jones, constituted a search subject to the limitations of the Fourth Amendment.  While the general public, including the police, generally have license to approach a house’s front door (for example, to leave a flier or ask the occupant to answer a question), that license does not include an invitation to bring a dog onto the porch to search for drugs.  If a member of the public did that, Justice Scalia observed, it would “inspire most of us to – well, call the police.”  For that reason, the majority decision found it unnecessary to decide whether the dog sniff also violated the suspect’s reasonable expectation of privacy.  When the police trespass onto private property to conduct a search, the Fourth Amendment applies regardless of whether the trespass also invades someone’s reasonable expectation of privacy.
Justice Kagan’s concurrence was devoted to explaining why, in her view, the case was an easy one under either a property- or privacy-based Fourth Amendment test.  No one would think it reasonable for a stranger to come to one’s porch with a pair of high powered binoculars and peer through the windows.  In the concurrence’s view, the dog sniff in this case was no different and no less an invasion of the occupant’s reasonable expectation of privacy.
The four Justice dissent found no support in the common law for the majority’s conclusion that the police conduct here constituted a trespass.  The majority acknowledged that the public, including the police, have license to approach the front door.  Justice Alito found nothing special about the fact that the police brought a drug sniffing dog with them (after all, “Dogs have been domesticated for about 12,000 years; they were ubiquitous in both this country and Britain at the time of the adoption of the Fourth Amendment.”).  The dissenters also did not view the dog sniff as invading any reasonable expectation of privacy given that one can expect that odors will waft outside of a house and, possibly, into public areas where there is no question a dog could sniff for evidence of drugs without constituting a search. a

Europe's financial crisis leads to suicide surge

$
0
0

The harsh spending cuts introduced by European governments to tackle their crippling debt problems have not only pitched the region into recession — they are also being partly blamed for outbreaks of diseases not normally seen in Europe and a spike in suicides, according to new research.

Since the crisis first struck in 2008, state-run welfare and health services across Europe have seen their budgets cut, medical treatments rationed and unpopular measures such as hospital user fees introduced.
Those countries that have slashed public spending the hardest — namely Greece, Spain and Portugal — have fared the worst medically.

"Austerity measures haven't solved the economic problems and they have also created big health problems," said Martin McKee, a professor of European Public Health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who led the research.
He said worsening health was driven not just by unemployment, but by the lack of a social welfare system to fall back on. "People need to have hope that the government will help them through this difficult time," he said.
The paper was published online Wednesday in a special series of the journal Lancet.
McKee said Greece in particular was struggling. Based on government data, he and colleagues found suicides rose by 40 percent in 2011 compared to the previous year. Last year, the country also reported an exponential rise in the number of HIV cases among drug users, due in part to addicts sharing contaminated syringes after needle exchange programs were dropped.

In recent years, Greece has also battled outbreaks of malaria, West Nile virus and dengue fever.
"These are not diseases we would normally expect to see in Europe," said Willem de Jonge, general director of Medecins Sans Frontieres in Greece.
In 2011, MSF helped Greece tackle a malaria outbreak that broke out after authorities scrapped spraying programs to kill mosquitoes.
"There's a strong willingness in the government to respond (to health problems) but the problem is a lack of resources," de Jonge said.

Outside Madrid's Hospital Clinico San Carlos, several patients grumbled about deteriorating medical care.
"The cutbacks are noticeable in many ways," said Mari Carmen Cervera, 54, an unemployed nurse. Cervera's mother was initially admitted to the hospital with a serious heart problem that required surgery. Cervera says her mother was discharged too early and had to be brought back when she had trouble breathing one night.
"While she was (hospitalized), she wasn't being properly washed by the nursing staff, so I had to do it myself," she said. "I personally think what has happened to my mother is a consequence of negligence and I am going to make an official complaint as soon as (she) is well enough to come home again."
Hans Kluge of the World Health Organization's European office, advised countries against radical health reforms during an economic crisis. "In every health system, there is fat to cut," he said, recommending countries start with straightforward measures such as buying more generic drugs or eliminating unnecessary hospital beds.

Still, McKee and colleagues found not all countries mired in debt are unhealthy. Despite massive losses in its banking sector, Iceland rejected a bailout deal prescribed by the International Monetary Fund. McKee and colleagues didn't find any bump in suicides and the population may even be healthier since it nearly went bankrupt — which could have been a result of global junk food chains pulling out of the country due to rising food costs.
Elsewhere, the researchers noted a drop in road accidents as more drivers opted for public transport. In turn, that has led to a shortage of organ donations and transplants, particularly in Spain and Ireland.

SpaceX Dragon spacecraft returns to Earth

$
0
0
A Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) Dragon spacecraft successfully completed the company's second cargo flight to the International Space Station on Tuesday, with a 12:36 pm EDT splashdown in the Pacific Ocean a few hundred miles west of Baja California, Mexico.

"The scientific research delivered and being returned by Dragon enables advances in every aspect of NASA's diverse space station science portfolio, including human research, biology and physical sciences," Julie Robinson, International Space Station Program scientist, said.

"There are more than 200 active investigations underway aboard our orbiting laboratory in space. The scientific community has eagerly awaited the return of today's Dragon to see what new insights the returned samples and investigations it carries will unveil," she said.

Science being conducted aboard the space station includes research on physical and biological processes that cannot be done anywhere else, applied research to improve lives on Earth, and exploration research to help humans move safely beyond Earth orbit.

A boat will take the Dragon capsule to a port near Los Angeles, where it will be prepared for a return journey to SpaceX's test facility in McGregor, Texas, for processing.

Some cargo will be removed at the port in California and returned to NASA within 48 hours.

This includes a freezer packed with research samples collected in the space station's unique microgravity environment. The remainder of the cargo will be returned to Texas with the capsule.

Dragon is the only space station resupply spacecraft able to return a significant amount of cargo to Earth.

The spacecraft lifted off from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida on March 1, carrying about 1,268 pounds (575 kilograms) of supplies and investigations.

It returned about 2,668 pounds (1,210 kilograms) of science samples, equipment and education activities.

Investigations included among the returned cargo could aid in food production during future long-duration space missions and enhance crop production on Earth.

Others could help in the development of more efficient solar cells, detergents and semiconductor-based electronics.

Among the returned investigations was the Coarsening in Solid-Liquid Mixtures (CSLM-3) experiment, which also launched to space aboard this Dragon.

CLSM-3 studies how crystals known as dendrites form as a metal alloy becomes solid.

The research could help engineers develop stronger materials for use in automobile, aircraft and spacecraft parts.

Dragon also is returning several human research samples that will help scientists continue to examine how the human body reacts to long-term spaceflight. The results will have implications for future space exploration and direct benefits here on Earth.

The mission was the second of at least 12 cargo resupply trips SpaceX plans to make to the space station through 2016 under NASA 's Commercial Resupply Services contract.

Big freeze may last until the end of April

$
0
0
The big freeze gripping the UK could last until almost the end of April, with sub-zero temperatures expected for the rest of the week, weather forecasters have predicted.
Clockwise from top right: A gritting vehicle stuck in a ditch in Stirlingshire, daffodils in the snow, sheep in Yorkshire and groundstaff clearing the snow at Windsor Park

Temperatures are unlikely to recover to normal averages for the time of year until the latter part of next month, the Met Office has suggested in its 30-day forecast.

Freezing temperatures look set to bring misery to thousands of people for the rest of the week and throughout Easter weekend as the dangerous wintry weather shows no immediate signs of abating.

The Met Office has issued a cold weather alert for much of England, with a 100 per cent probability of severe cold weather and icy conditions until Friday.

Its outlook for Sunday until April 9 predicts cold, dry weather, with a few light snow flurries and widespread frost and icy patches overnight, with temperatures unlikely to return to normal levels for this time of year until the latter part of April.

Thousands of people in western Scotland face a sixth day without power today after being cut off last week, and many transport routes across the UK remain impassable because of deep snow drifts.
More than 3,000 people in Argyll in Scotland and the Isle of Arran were without power after ice and snow damaged pylons, damaging the electricity network.

Farmers have been left counting the cost of the blizzard conditions, with many having to rescue stranded livestock at the height of the lambing season.

An RAF Chinook helicopter was called in yesterday to help as part of an emergency operation in Northern Ireland as farms and families were cut off by huge snow drifts.

The severe weather has also been blamed for the deaths of a number of birds, including puffins, razorbills and guillemots, which have washed up on Britain's beaches.

Whiskey galore turned to a wee dram after caretaker 'drinks woman's $100,000 find'

$
0
0
A New York woman was stunned to find nine cases of 100-year-old whiskey worth $100,000 hidden in the walls of her mansion. Then, it mysteriously disappeared... and she thinks she knows who to blame. Jon Swaine reports.
The caretaker is due to appear in court in Pennsylvania charged with stealing and drinking 52 of the bottles of Old Farm Pure Rye 

When Patricia Hill discovered a batch of 100-year-old whiskey hidden in the walls of the house she was renovating in Pennsylvania, the haul was so large that she needed help to remove it.

Fortunately John Saunders, the live-in caretaker of the mansion Ms Hill was transforming into a bed-and-breakfast, was on hand to assist in transporting and cleaning the nine cases of pre-Prohibition tipple.

Yet after dusting the bottles down, Mr Saunders, 62, allegedly returned on his own to polish half of them off.

The caretaker is due to appear in court today in Pennsylvania, charged with stealing and drinking 52 of the bottles of Old Farm Pure Rye, which were valued by Bonhams, the auctioneers, at about $102,000 (£67,000) - almost $2,000 per bottle.

Returning last year to inspect the whisky, which was produced in 1912 at a nearby distillery owned by the industrialists Henry Frick and Andrew Mellon, Ms Hill says that she found about half the boxes contained empty bottles.
“I thought I was going to faint,” she told The Daily Telegraph. “I was in shock.”

“The corks were removed or a hole punched through the bottom half to get the whisky out,” Barry Pritts, the local police chief, later said in his report. “The labels were pulled off.”

Mr Saunders, sitting quietly in a nearby recliner, humbly offered an explanation. “The whisky probably evaporated,” he told police. And besides, “being that it was old”, it “was probably no good”.

Yet Ms Hill, 57, was immediately suspicious. “I picked him up out of his chair and said ‘Tell me the truth!’” she said. “But he stuck to his story.”

However it is alleged that the caretaker, apparently no fan of CSI, did not count on police recovering a sample of his DNA from his home, after he failed to turn up to an appointment for a cheek swab.

“The DNA profile obtained from John William Saunders matched the DNA profile obtained from the mouth of three of the whisky bottles,” said Chief Pritts.

“What a nerve,” said Ms Hill, who had planned to display the whisky in a nearby museum. “To me it is just unfathomable. But, I suppose, it must have been delicious.”

Mr Saunders was fired by Ms Hill and is scheduled to appear for a preliminary hearing at a district court in Scottdale today. He faces up to seven years in prison and a maximum fine of $15,000 if convicted. Mr Saunders denies the charges.

Ms Hill’s renovation of the mansion, which once belonged to JP Brennen, a local coal and coke tycoon, was completed. After opening her bed and breakfast last year, she remains “an optimist”, she said.

However she deeply regrets the loss of the vintage whisky, which Brennen is believed to have kept for sharing with renowned local industrialists Frick, Mellon and Andrew Carnegie. “Saunders literally pissed it away,” she claimed. “All that history — down the toilet.”

5 Surprising Holiday Health Myths

$
0
0

Many supposed holiday hazards are as innocuous as a tepid mug of apple cider. A review article in the current issue of the British Medical Journal cites five fears that can officially be crossed off the holiday worry list.

Myth 1: Sugar makes kids hyperactive.

"There have been more studies on this than on many drugs," said article author Dr. Aaron Carroll of the Indiana University School of Medicine, "all of which show there is no link between sugar and hyperactivity." Even if the kids are "sugar sensitive" or have attention-deficit disorder, he continued, sweets do not change their behavior.


Parents may think their kids become more chaotic after candy and other treats but "it is in their heads," said primary author Dr. Rachel Vreeman, also of the Indiana University School of Medicine. She pointed to a study that told parents their kid was slurping a sugar-loaded beverage, when the drink instead was essentially water. The parents reported the child going bonkers when objective observers thought otherwise, she said.

Myth 2: Suicides increase over the holidays.

The weather is woeful, the relatives are rude and melancholy moods abound. "But contrary to what many of us think, suicides are actually more common, around the world, during times of year that are warmer and sunnier," Vreeman said. The article also cites a 35-year study conducted in the United States showing that holidays – including Christmas, the Fourth of July and birthdays – are not preferred times to take one’s life.

Myth 3: Poinsettias are toxic.

Shooing the dog or child away from the perilous plant of holiday cheer? Let the hollering subside. The American Association of Poison Control Centers has a record of 22,793 cases of human poinsettia ingestion and zero resulted in significant poisoning. Ninety-six percent of the poinsettia-eaters didn’t even need to see a doctor, Vreeman said. And rats that gobbled several hundred grams of the pureed flower, the equivalent of a human eating 500-600 poinsettia leaves, did just fine. Still, it’s best to call the poison control center when any non-food plant is eaten, she said.

Myth 4: You lose most of your body heat through your head.

Your mother said it. Every hat salesman touts it. Even the U.S. Army Field Manual claims "40 to 45 percent of body heat" is lost through the head, the researchers write in this week's article, but it is simply not true. Body heat leaves from any skin surface in proportion to the area exposed, said Vreeman. As for people who claim a hat renders shorts acceptable in cold weather? "Those people are being very, very foolish," Carroll said. "There is nothing special about the head."

Myth 5: Eating at night makes you fat.

While eating late at night has been associated with obesity, midnight munching does not cause obesity. "You shouldn’t be afraid to have that midnight snack anymore than a mid-day or mid-morning snack," Carroll said. The article, citing several studies, suggests that Santa’s jolly belly is the result of too many calories overall, not just the holiday treats laid out for him in the evening.

Carroll and Vreeman’s book "Don't Swallow Your Gum: Myths, Half-truths, and Outright Lies About Your Body and Health" will be published in 2009 by St. Martin Press.

7 Medical Myths Even Doctors Believe

$
0
0

Popular culture is loaded with myths and half-truths. Most are harmless. But when doctors start believing medical myths, perhaps it's time to worry.
In the British Medical Journalthis week, researchers looked into several common misconceptions, from the belief that a person should drink eight glasses of water per day to the notion that reading in low light ruins your eyesight.
"We got fired up about this because we knew that physicians accepted these beliefs and were passing this information along to their patients," said Dr. Aaron Carroll, assistant professor of pediatrics at the Indiana University School of Medicine. "And these beliefs are frequently cited in the popular media."
And so here they are, so that you can inform your doctor:

Myth: We use only 10 percent of our brains.
Fact: Physicians and comedians alike, including Jerry Seinfeld, love to cite this one. It's sometimes erroneously credited to Albert Einstein. But MRI scans, PET scans and other imaging studies show no dormant areas of the brain, and even viewing individual neurons or cells reveals no inactive areas, the new paper points out. Metabolic studies of how brain cells process chemicals show no nonfunctioning areas. The myth probably originated with self-improvement hucksters in the early 1900s who wanted to convince people that they had yet not reached their full potential, Carroll figures. It also doesn't jibe with the fact that our other organs run at full tilt.

Myth: You should drink at least eight glasses of water a day.
Fact: "There is no medical evidence to suggest that you need that much water," said Dr. Rachel Vreeman, a pediatrics research fellow at the university and co-author of the journal article. Vreeman thinks this myth can be traced back to a 1945 recommendation from the Nutrition Council that a person consume the equivalent of 8 glasses (64 ounces) of fluid a day. Over the years, "fluid" turned to water. But fruits and vegetables, plus coffee and other liquids, count.

Myth: Fingernails and hair grow after death.
Fact: Most physicians queried on this one initially thought it was true. Upon further reflection, they realized it's impossible. Here's what happens: "As the body’s skin is drying out, soft tissue, especially skin, is retracting," Vreeman said. "The nails appear much more prominent as the skin dries out. The same is true, but less obvious, with hair. As the skin is shrinking back, the hair looks more prominent or sticks up a bit."

Myth: Shaved hair grows back faster, coarser and darker.
Fact: A 1928 clinical trial compared hair growth in shaved patches to growth in non-shaved patches. The hair which replaced the shaved hair was no darker or thicker, and did not grow in faster. More recent studies have confirmed that one. Here's the deal: When hair first comes in after being shaved, it grows with a blunt edge on top, Carroll and Vreeman explain. Over time, the blunt edge gets worn so it may seem thicker than it actually is. Hair that's just emerging can be darker too, because it hasn't been bleached by the sun.

Myth: Reading in dim light ruins your eyesight.
Fact: The researchers found no evidence that reading in dim light causes permanent eye damage. It can cause eye strain and temporarily decreased acuity, which subsides after rest.

Myth: Eating turkey makes you drowsy.
Fact: Even Carroll and Vreeman believed this one until they researched it. The thing is, a chemical in turkey called tryptophan is known to cause drowsiness. But turkey doesn't contain any more of it than does chicken or beef. This myth is fueled by the fact that turkey is often eaten with a colossal holiday meal, often accompanied by alcohol — both things that will make you sleepy.

Myth: Mobile phones are dangerous in hospitals.
Fact: There are no known cases of death related to this one. Cases of less-serious interference with hospital devices seem to be largely anecdotal, the researchers found. In one real study, mobile phones were found to interfere with 4 percent of devices, but only when the phone was within 3 feet of the device. A more recent study, this year, found no interference in 300 tests in 75 treatment rooms. To the contrary, when doctors use mobile phones, the improved communication means they make fewer mistakes
.
"Whenever we talk about this work, doctors at first express disbelief that these things are not true," said Vreeman said. "But after we carefully lay out medical evidence, they are very willing to accept that these beliefs are actually false."

10 Diets That Just Don't Work

$
0
0

Food is essential for life. It's also vital for happiness and feeling good about oneself, according to Kip Hardy, a registered dietician with Emory Healthcare in Atlanta, Ga. She points to the global tradition of sharing food, such as with one's family at dinnertime, with friends on vacation or going out for a meal with colleagues at work. This means that food can either help connect people or divide them, and one feature of unhealthy eating patterns or fad diets it they cause isolation because they're so drastic. Remember the Grapefruit Diet that promised people they'd drop 10 pounds in 12 days? It worked by dramatically restricting calories and carbohydrates. But it also induced fatigue and meal monotony.
"The hallmark of a lot of fad diets popularized in the last few years is that they reduce or increase the intake of a macro nutrient -- fats, carbohydrates and proteins -- to the extreme," explains Hardy. "You can't take any one of these away to a significant level for a significant amount of time … it's just not healthy."
We realize that losing weight may be the only goal of these diets for many people. Nevertheless, many of these diets simply don't work for an extended period of time. When we say "work," we mean losing the pounds slowly and methodically and being able to maintain your ideal weight without relying on excessive calorie restriction, complicated menus, expensive pills or dramatic food limitations. It means finding a lifestyle change that you can embrace. If you're one of the many people in search of more information on the do's and don'ts of dieting, read on to learn about 10 diets that don't work and why.

10: The Acai Diet

The acai (pronounced ah-sigh-ee) berry, once a no-name fruit from the Amazonian palm, has in recent years soared into the world's nomenclature for its health benefits. It's been promoted for its high antioxidant content and its ability to improve digestion, detoxify the body and slow down aging. It's also become popular as a dietary supplement to promote weight loss 
The acai diet became popular after Dr. Nicholas Perricone lauded the berry's high antioxidant benefits on the Oprah Winfrey Show. There isn't an exact regimen for this diet, but the idea is to incorporate these supplements into your daily routine. The cost of using supplements ranges from $40 to 80 each month, and they can be bought in various forms, including as a juice or capsule. Keep in mind that the supplements aren't regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. And unfortunately, acai's health benefits, particularly those of weight loss, haven't been scientifically proven.

9: Atkins Diet

Is this just an excuse to eat bacon all day? Not exactly, but the diet works by requiring people to drastically reduce their consumption of carbohydrates and replace them with protein, whether it's bacon, cheese or eggs. The idea is that overweight people tend to eat too many refined carbohydrates, or empty calories. Without carbohydrates, the body will then begin burning the fat that they initially produced.
However, nutritionists and doctors are concerned about a couple of aspects of this diet. The first is a process known as ketosis -- where the body burns its own fat stores as energy  . The harmful side effects can be halitosis, constipation and even kidney and liver damage (unless the person consumes lots of fluids), since these organs have to work overtime to process the elevated levels of protein. Finally, carbohydrates have always been part a building block of a healthy diet that leads to sustained energy and healthy brain function  . Without carbohydrates, you may be skinnier, but not necessarily healthy. And then what's the point?

8: Dukan Diet

Attack, cruise, consolidation and stabilization are the beginning stages of the Dukan Diet  . These may sound more like the phases of a naval battle than those of diet, but they convey one point: Fat is the enemy and you're going to obliterate it. Here's how it works: Over a decade ago, a French physician named Pierre Dukan realized that if a person's food consumption is restricted to mostly lean protein, the pounds fall away. Yes, this may sound similar to the Atkins Diet .
As with Atkins, nutritionists and doctors warn that by eliminating carbohydrates and restricting other foods, such as vegetables and fruit, you're also restricting your nutrient intake. Besides nutritional deficiencies, you may also end up with bad breath, fatigue and kidney problems. The bottom line is that while you may end up a few pounds lighter, don't expect to maintain this weight unless you've always preferred eating pork and oat bran.

7: Blood-type Diet

Perhaps this diet sounds feasible since it mentions one of the body's most basic biological components in its title -- blood. Don't be fooled, though; there's no proof that this diet works  . To be fair, it hasn't been disproved either. "From my understanding, health and wellness was the primary focus of this diet, and weight loss was a nice side effect, if you're able to master the food restrictions," says Hardy.
The diet is based on the notion that food intake should be determined by blood type (A, vegetarian; B, a balanced omnivore diet; AB, combination of food groups in moderation; or O, high protein), and that food proteins are digested differently depending on these various blood types . Thereby, health problems can result from eating food that's not well matched to your specific blood type.
In the end, the type of diet that has proven to be the most healthy and reliable requires a combination of eating all the food groups in moderation and frequent, low-impact exercise.

6: Cookie Diet

Dr. Sanford Siegal, the inventor of this program, baked up his own version of a cookie, complete with fiber and essential amino acids, as a replacement for breakfast and lunch [ ]. All you need to do is eat four to six (for 500 calories) cookies each day, eat a dinner made up of lean proteins and vegetables (300 to 1,000 calories), and voila! You're on your way to shedding pounds … at least for the short amount of time you find cookies an enjoyable meal replacement.
One caveat, says dietician Hardy: Be wary of any diet that pushes the benefits of eating only one type of food or restricting your diet to a few items. While you may be able to drop the pounds in a couple of weeks, you'll feel unsatisfied and be hungry frequently. "It's the same as Slim Fast," continues Hardy. "Who really wants to drink a couple shakes or eat a couple cookies knowing that you're missing out on the opportunity to savor your food and let it nourish you?"

5: The Master Cleanse

This is one of Hollywood's hottest diets. Celebrities such as Beyoncé, Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore have waxed about the quick weight-loss benefits of the Master Cleanse. The only problem? This concoction of lemon juice, maple syrup and cayenne pepper was never intended as a weight loss plan. Instead, it was created as a body detox system to bring the body's pH balance from an acidic state to an alkaline, or healthy state .
Cleansing can help people reset their eating routine if they've gotten into bad habits. And while it may make them feel good, cleansing shouldn't be used as a diet plan. It can't be maintained and the weight will return along with regular food consumption.

4: The HCG Diet

People will go to great lengths to lose weight quickly, no matter how painful or madcap the plan. Here's the proof: The HCG diet involves daily injections or supplements of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) -- a pregnancy hormone that's been approved as an infertility treatment, but shows little evidence that it helps people lose weight . The hormone coupled with intense calorie restriction is at the heart of this diet. Sadly, severe calorie restriction can have deleterious health effects, including the inability to fulfill one's nutritional needs. Also, hCG's side effects may involve headaches, fatigue, irritability and male breast enlargement.

3: Raw Food Diet

This vegan diet promotes the consumption of organic and natural foods such as fresh fruits, coconut milk, natural foods, seaweed, dried fruits, grains, beans, nuts and vegetables  . There are definitely people who can consume raw food for extended periods of time and be fine and healthy. But most people find it extremely restrictive and have a hard time getting enough vitamin B12 and vitamin A. The reason for this is that some nutrients, such as lycopene (an important antioxidant for prostate and blood health that's found in tomatoes), aren't available until the food is cooked. The same goes for the iron found in leafy greens. "I would never, as a dietician, recommend that someone follow a raw foods diet," says Hardy. "But, if you still decide to, you have to be very committed to food preparation."

2: Zone Diet

One of the more effective and less controversial fad diets, the Zone Diet calls for you to maintain a fixed ratio of proteins (30 percent), carbohydrates (40 percent) and fats (30 percent). This makes it easy to follow. Even so, nutritionists and dieticians fear that the Zone promotes eating high amounts of saturated fat, which can be harmful to your cholesterol and can lead to heart disease over a long period. This diet also completely ignores the fact that people may still get hungry and lack energy .

1: The Paleolithic Diet

This diet goes by many names: the Paleo Diet, the Caveman Diet, the Stone Age Diet or the hunter-gatherer diet. Whatever your preference, this eating plan is based on the food consumed during the Paleolithic era that ended about 10,000 years ago. This means that the suggested foods can be hunted, fished or gathered. This includes foods such as pork, seafood, eggs, fruits, nuts and vegetables. Foods to avoid include grains, legumes, dairy products, salt, refined sugar and processed oils.
The only downfall to this diet, says Hardy, is that once again the food limitations make it difficult to maintain. There may also be problems with receiving all the necessary nutrients derived from legumes, whole grains and reduced-fat dairy products  .
Want to learn more about losing or maintaining your weight? There's lots more information on the next page.










Frankie Boyle donates £50,000 to a prisoner in Guantanamo Guantanamo to sue MI6

$
0
0

He’s the television comedian best known for controversial jokes about swimmer Rebecca Adlington, The Queen and people with Down’s syndrome.
But Frankie Boyle is now using his fame, and wealth, for more serious ends, by donating tens of thousands of pounds of his money to help Britain’s last inmate at Guantanamo Bay to sue the MI6.

Yesterday the Glaswegian comic announced the £50,000 compensation he won from a recent libel victory against the Daily Mirror newspaper, would go towards a landmark legal attempt to sue Britain’s security services over accusations they have defamed Shaker Aamer, the only British resident still languishing without charge in Guantanamo.
Boyle, who has decided to retire from comedy early next year after repeated clashes over his controversial style of humour, unveiled his plan alongside Reprieve, the British-American charity which has long represented inmates of Washington’s extra-judicial jail.

Even Boyle, who is best known for his performances on BBC panel show Mock the Week, admits his involvement in the case sounds a little far-fetched. “I remember reading [the US pop star] Usher crashed a hot air balloon into something, and I thought ‘this is just a random word generator’”, he told The Independent yesterday. “It feels a bit like that.”
Clive Stafford-Smith, the director of Reprieve, admitted the libel action untested legal formula but said there was important legal ground that needed to be explored. “If the Daily Mirror says something bad about Frankie that embarrasses him or humiliates him then he has the right to sue,” he said.

“If, on the other hand, a far more powerful organisation, the British government and their agents, say something about Shaker – whereby instead of being humiliated he’s banged up in prison for eleven years for something he patently didn’t do and something he’s never been charged with –  then the British  government’s position is Shaker can  do nothing.”
Aamer was arrested in Afghanistan in late 2001 and is the only British resident left in Guantanamo, a US detention centre in Cuba. He has been cleared for release by the US authorities but has yet to be freed as the Americans have insisted on returning him to Saudi Arabia. Although he holds Saudi nationality with his British residency, Aamer’s wife and four children – one of whom he has never met – live in London. The British government are supportive of him returning to the UK but the Americans have so far refused to hand him over.

A Foreign Office spokesperson said they could not comment on any on-going legal proceedings but Reprieve claim that they have already seen a response from Government lawyers claiming the security services are protected by legal privilege.
“The claim they would make is they would have law enforcement privilege,” said Stafford-Smith. “But our response to that is they’re not enforcing any law because Shaker has not broken any law, he’s not been prosecuted for breaking any law and they’re not investigating him for breaking any law. So our position is they would have no such privilege.”

19-Year-Old Student Develops Ocean Cleanup Array That Could Remove 7,250,000 Tons Of Plastic From the World's Oceans

$
0
0



19-year-old Boyan Slat has unveiled plans to create an Ocean Cleanup Array that could remove 7,250,000 tons of plastic waste from the world’s oceans. The device consists of an anchored network of floating booms and processing platforms that could be dispatched to garbage patches around the world. Instead of moving through the ocean, the array would span the radius of a garbage patch, acting as a giant funnel. The angle of the booms would force plastic in the direction of the platforms, where it would be separated from plankton, filtered and stored for recycling.


At school, Boyan Slat launched a project that analyzed the size and amount of plastic particles in the ocean’s garbage patches. His final paper went on to win several prizes, including Best Technical Design 2012 at the Delft University of Technology. Boyan continued to develop his concept during the summer of 2012, and he revealed it several months later at TEDxDelft 2012.

Slat went on to found The Ocean Cleanup Foundation, a non-profit organization which is responsible for the development of his proposed technologies. His ingenious solution could potentially save hundreds of thousands of aquatic animals annually, and reduce pollutants (including PCB and DDT) from building up in the food chain. It could also save millions per year, both in clean-up costs, lost tourism and damage to marine vessels.

It is estimated that the clean-up process would take about five years, and it could greatly increase awareness about the world’s plastic garbage patches. On his site Slat says, “One of the problems with preventive work is that there isn’t any imagery of these ‘garbage patches’, because the debris is dispersed over millions of square kilometres. By placing our arrays however, it will accumulate along the booms, making it suddenly possible to actually visualize the oceanic garbage patches. We need to stress the importance of recycling, and reducing our consumption of plastic packaging.” To find out more about the project and to contribute, click here.
Viewing all 6389 articles
Browse latest View live